Gi vs No-Gi Debate

Few topics spark as much heated debate in the BJJ community as gi versus no-gi training. Advocates of gi argue that it builds better fundamentals, slows down the pace for deeper technical learning, and connects practitioners to the art’s traditions. No-gi proponents counter that their style is more applicable to MMA, self-defense, and the modern competitive scene.

The debate extends beyond practicality into questions of identity and culture. Some practitioners see gi and no-gi as complementary, while others align themselves strongly with one camp. As professional no-gi tournaments gain popularity, the divide has sharpened—but it has also fueled technical cross-pollination, pushing the sport forward in both formats.